Skip to content

Career Ladder Nonsense

Software engineering careers: interviews, levels, offers and pay

t/career-ladder-nonsense

Interviews, levels, offers, promotions and the performance review that said "more visibility". Salary talk welcome.

52 members
15 posts
Created Aug 2026
+2

Community rules

3 rules for t/career-ladder-nonsense

  1. No company-identifying gossip

    Talk about the situation, not the named colleague who cannot reply here.

  2. Bring the detail

    Versions, error text, what you already tried. "It does not work" is not a question anyone can answer.

  3. No drive-by self promotion

    Share your own work when it answers the thread. A link with no context is a advert, and it gets removed.

Discussions

1

Showing 15 posts.

Posts in t/career-ladder-nonsense

  • Accepted answer

    Honest but kind version, from someone who has screened a lot of these: 1. Drop the two-column template and the skill bars. Applicant tracking systems often parse two columns badly, and "80% Python" means nothing to a reader. Single column, plain. 2. 14 languages reads as zero languages. List the 3 or 4 you could be interviewed on tomorrow. 3. Cut the coursework, keep 2-3 projects, and write each bullet as what you built, how, and what happened. "Built a Rust CLI that streams large CSV files to JSON without loading them into memory" beats "CSV to JSON converter". 4. Add READMEs with a screenshot and how to run it. Some reviewers click, make it worth the click. 5. Tailor the top third to each role. 60 identical applications is a lottery, 20 tailored ones is a strategy.
    1 reply
9

  • Accepted answer

    Seattle, unless you hate the idea of living there. Reasons: 1) A big US tech internship on a co-op resume is the strongest signal for new grad loops, on both sides of the border. 2) $55 USD/hr plus stipend over 4 months is serious savings at 20. 3) If you get a return offer, it will likely be far above a Toronto new grad package. The startup is the best learning per hour, but you can do that later as a new grad with more leverage. The bank is the safe choice, and safe is fine when you're optimizing for stress, not career. One thing before you sign: ask the Seattle team which org you'd be in. Team matters more than logo.
    1 reply
13

  • 1. self-reported "rested" with the trial on the line is worthless, you admit it. 2. summer. 3. n=6. so what we actually have is: deploys went down. the one hard number went the wrong way. well, actually, that's your result
    2 replies
  • Credit for posting the thing that got worse. That section is why I believe the rest. One question: did deploy size change? Fewer, bigger deploys would explain the PR cycle time and look fine in your table while hiding risk.
    1 reply
13

  • i'm not even in tech yet and this made me cry a little. medical billing office here and my boss makes us use PTO in 4 hour blocks for school stuff. someday 🦉
  • Reading this at 5.30 am before the tiffin boxes. I did the sneaking out for my son's sports day in 2017, one year before my break, and I still remember answering an email while he ran. Thank you Divya. When I am back in an office I am using this exact format.
9

  • Accepted answer

    Take it, keep interviewing, and don't feel guilty about either. 1) Your next offer will be anchored to your market value, not this number, especially if you frame it as "I took a role to stay current after a layoff". Nobody serious holds that against anyone in this market. 2) Before you sign, ask for a 6-month compensation review in writing. You have more leverage today than you will on day one. 3) Tell the recruiters for both pending loops that you have an offer with a deadline. That often speeds things up. The worst outcome here is draining savings while the market stays slow, and then making a worse decision under more pressure in October.
    1 reply