unpopular opinion: code review is just centralised…
Wyatt Kessler@wagmi_wyatt
unpopular opinion: code review is just centralised gatekeeping. let the agents merge straight to main. decentralise your repo fren 🚀 the future has no PR approvals
Get the best of #meme_driven_dev weekly
One email each Monday with the most useful posts. No spam; unsubscribe in one click.
Comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
Sign in to commentJosé Gregorio Marcano@chamo_coder
pana, I get paid in USDT and even I think this is a bad idea. the one time my client skipped review we sent invoices to every customer with amount 0. chévere for the customers, not for him
José Gregorio Marcano@chamo_coder
"skill issue" is what people say when they never had a real outage, chamo
Ondřej Hrubý@rewrite_it_in_rust
for once I agree with wagmi. the borrow checker is the only reviewer I need 🦀
Karthik Subramaniam@karthi_rustacean
The borrow checker does not review business logic. It will happily let you charge a customer twice, safely.
Karl Lindqvist@kernel_karl
We tried merging without review once. It was called "the build is broken again".
Danny Cho@danny_cho_la
Code review is less about catching bugs and more about having two people who understand the change. When the author is an agent and nobody reviews, that number is zero. Hard pass.