Skip to content
article

Why I will not help you find where a soldier lives

OSINT is a method. Doxxing with good intentions is still doxxing

Marta Kovalenko@marta_osint

June 28, 2026 · 2 min read

After my geolocation post I got several DMs. Most were nice. Three asked the same thing: there is a video of a Russian soldier, can you find his home address, his family, his mother's page. One person wrote "you are Ukrainian, you should want this more than me".

I understand the feeling. I have it too. My answer is still no, and here is why, so I do not have to write it in DMs again.

1. You will get the wrong person

Face matching from a blurry video is unreliable. Same name, same city, similar face, and suddenly a random man and his kids are getting messages. This has happened many times. The famous example is the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, when an online crowd "identified" a student who had nothing to do with it, and his family suffered for it. The crowd was confident. The crowd was wrong.

2. Even if you are right, the address is not only his

His mother lives there. Maybe children. Neighbours. Publishing a home address is not justice, it is an invitation for someone else to do something you will not control.

3. Evidence has a proper place

If a video shows a crime, the useful thing is to preserve it properly and give it to people who build cases: national prosecutors, international investigators, documentation groups. Not a Telegram channel. What I do instead:

  • Save the original file, not a screen recording. Record where and when you found it.
  • Hash it: sha256sum video.mp4, and keep the hash with your notes, so later you can show the file was not changed.
  • Archive the page (Wayback Machine, archive.today).
  • Geolocate and date the event, not the person.

If you want to learn how this is done seriously, read the Berkeley Protocol on Digital Open Source Investigations. It is free and it is written exactly for this.

4. In this topic, it is a ban

Rules say no doxxing. This includes "just public info put together". Compiling it is the act.

I know some of you will say this is soft. Fine. I would rather be soft than be the reason an innocent man gets hurt because he looks like someone in a video.

Written by

Marta Kovalenko

Backend dev (Python, Postgres) and OSINT hobbyist. From Zaporizhzhia, in Kraków since March 2022. Geolocation, satellite imagery, verifying before sharing. Post a claim without a source in my topic and I will ask for one. Слава Україні.

Get the best of #wars_votes_and_wires weekly

One email each Monday with the most useful posts. No spam; unsubscribe in one click.

Comments

14

Sign in to join the conversation.

Sign in to comment
Bartek Wójcik@bartek_gamedev5 rep in Wars, Votes and Wires
Honestly Marta, I disagree a little. If someone is on video doing war crime, public pressure works. Their families should know what they did. Why protect them?
1 net votes
Marta Kovalenko@marta_osint#2 in Wars, Votes and Wires
I am not protecting him. I am protecting the man who looks like him, and the kids at the address. And the video is more useful for a court than for a mob. I understand the feeling, Bartek, I have it every day. The address is not where justice happens.
1 net votes
Bartek Wójcik@bartek_gamedev5 rep in Wars, Votes and Wires
ok, the wrong person part convinced me. I forgot the Boston story completely. still angry though
-1 net votes
Marta Kovalenko@marta_osint#2 in Wars, Votes and Wires
Angry is fine. Me too)
1 net votes
Nadia Benali@nullbyte_nadia2 rep in Wars, Votes and Wires
Same rule in bug bounty: you can find it does not mean you can use it. Scope matters. This post should be pinned.
3 net votes
Wolfgang Engel@dsgvo_wolf2 rep in Wars, Votes and Wires
Also legally: in the EU, compiling and publishing a private person's home address is processing of personal data without a lawful basis under Art. 6 GDPR, and in Germany it can also be a criminal offence since 2021. Good intentions are not a legal basis.
4 net votes
Iryna Melnyk@iryna_qa1 rep in Wars, Votes and Wires
Дякую, Марто. People think it is a game when it is far away. When it is close, you see who really pays.
3 net votes
Nate Calloway@nostep_nate7 rep in Wars, Votes and Wires
Counterpoint: if it's on a public VK profile, it's public. You're not "doxxing", you're reading. Who decides what's off limits? You?
1 net votes
Marta Kovalenko@marta_osint#2 in Wars, Votes and Wires
In this topic, yes, me and the rules) Reading is fine. Publishing a compiled address with a call to "visit" is not. The difference is what you do with it.
3 net votes
Nate Calloway@nostep_nate7 rep in Wars, Votes and Wires
So it's about intent. Thought police with extra steps.
0 net votes
Jussi Laaksonen@jussi_ops2 rep in Wars, Votes and Wires
It is about consequences. Wrong address, dead neighbour. Simple.
2 net votes
Mo Siddiqui@mo_boston3 rep in Wars, Votes and Wires
can we not turn every thread into a nate debate. good post marta
2 net votes
Nate Calloway@nostep_nate7 rep in Wars, Votes and Wires
you have me muted, how are you reading this
0 net votes
Mo Siddiqui@mo_boston3 rep in Wars, Votes and Wires
unmuted for 5 seconds to say that. muting again 🙄
1 net votes