Skip to content
article

Someone else's computer, rented by the hour: what my spare room costs versus the cloud

Real numbers from Hobart, including the parts that make the homelab look worse

Graham Whitfield@greybeard_graham

August 15, 2026 · 3 min read

Every few weeks someone on here tells me the cloud is cheaper. Sometimes it is. So I sat down with a pot of tea, my power bill, and my receipts, and worked it out properly. I have included the numbers that do not flatter me, because a comparison that only counts one side is an advertisement.

What is in the spare room

  • One Dell OptiPlex 7060 Micro, i5-8500T, 32GB, running Proxmox. About a dozen containers and two small VMs.
  • One HP MicroServer Gen10 Plus with four 4TB drives in ZFS, about 7TB usable after redundancy.
  • A small managed switch, the NBN box, and a UPS.

The homelab, per year

  • Power: 58W average at the wall, measured over three months with a plug-in meter. That is about 508 kWh a year. At roughly 30 cents a kWh on my bill, about $152.
  • Hardware: about $1,400 for everything, which I expect to last five years. $280 a year.
  • Drive replacements: I budget one drive every two years. About $100 a year.
  • Offsite backup of the important 1TB to object storage: about $100 a year.

Total: roughly $630 a year, a bit over $50 a month.

The cloud, for the same job

I will not quote a cloud provider's price list. They change, and the calculators tell you what you want to hear. But one number is simple. 7TB in object storage at $6 a terabyte a month is about $42 a month, before I run a single virtual machine, and before anybody charges me to download my own photos. Add compute for the containers and the two VMs, running 24 hours a day, and every way I priced it came out at two to four times my number.

The honest part

Here is what my $50 a month does not include:

  • My time. I value it at nothing, because I am retired and this is my hobby. If you are 30 with a job and a family, your evenings are not free, and you should count them.
  • Location. It is all in one room. A fire or a burst pipe takes it all. The offsite copy is my insurance, and it only covers what I chose to send.
  • Bandwidth. My upload is 20 Mbps. Serving anything to the public from here is a joke.
  • The bus factor. If I fall under one, my wife has a box she cannot operate. There is a folder, the Binder, with instructions in plain English, but she has made it clear she will be calling my nephew.

So which is it?

The cloud wins when the load is spiky, when users are all over the world, when you need someone on call who is not you, or when your time is worth more than your money. The spare room wins when the load is steady, 24 hours a day, every day, when you have a lot of storage, and when you enjoy it.

Most home workloads are the second kind. A photo library does not need to scale. It needs to sit there quietly and be there in twenty years.

And do not get me started on what has happened to the price of power over the last few years. Whichever lot is in Canberra, it only goes one way.

Cheers, G.

Written by

Graham Whitfield

Retired sysadmin, Hobart. 34 years of keeping other people's servers alive: VAX, Novell, Solaris, then far too much Windows Server. Now I run a home lab in the spare room and grow tomatoes. Still say 'the mainframe' out of habit.

Get the best of #self_hosted weekly

One email each Monday with the most useful posts. No spam; unsubscribe in one click.

Comments

14

Sign in to join the conversation.

Sign in to comment
Ryan Goh@ai_maxi_ryan2 rep in Self Hosted
ok but ur time is worth $0? serverless scales to zero, ur homelab doesnt. cope 🚀
5 net votes
Graham Whitfield@greybeard_graham#2 in Self Hosted
Ryan, my lab runs 24 hours a day because my photos exist 24 hours a day. "Scales to zero" is a wonderful property for a workload that is sometimes zero. Mine is not. As for my time, I said so in the post, in a section called "The honest part". It is the third heading. Cheers, G.
1 net votes
Ryan Goh@ai_maxi_ryan2 rep in Self Hosted
relax lah uncle. nobody serious runs a NAS in 2026 except dinosaurs and people who grow tomatoes
-5 net votes
Alasdair Reid@onprem_or_die#3 in Self Hosted
away and bile yer heid. the dinosaur's numbers are on the page. where are yours
3 net votes
Nguyễn Minh Hiếu@homelab_hieu#1 in Self Hosted
please both, calm down :) Ryan, if you have numbers for the serverless version, post them, I really want to compare
-1 net votes
Alasdair Reid@onprem_or_die#3 in Self Hosted
finally. numbers. and the honest section is what makes it. most "homelab is cheaper" posts forget the drives die and most "cloud is cheaper" posts forget egress exists. good man graham
3 net votes
Lindiwe Mokoena@loadshedding_lindi#4 in Self Hosted
Ja no, in SA the real homelab cost is the inverter and the battery, not the electricity. Mine was more than the servers. But the conclusion is the same: steady 24/7 load lives at home
1 net votes
Nguyễn Minh Hiếu@homelab_hieu#1 in Self Hosted
very fair comparison. my numbers are similar: ~17 USD a month power for 186W in Saigon, plus hardware. the "your time" point is the real one for me, with a full time job my evenings are not free :D
0 net votes
Elin Sjöberg@elin_pm2 rep in Self Hosted
Really interesting breakdown. But what happens when you need to scale?
4 net votes
Alasdair Reid@onprem_or_die#3 in Self Hosted
scale WHAT, elin. it's his holiday photos. they're not going to go viral and need a CDN
0 net votes
Elin Sjöberg@elin_pm2 rep in Self Hosted
Fair, I'm in product brain mode all day. Withdrawn 😅
0 net votes
Jordan Pike@jpike2 rep in Self Hosted
As someone who runs cloud infra for a living: he's right for steady state. Cloud is for when you need to be wrong quickly, or right globally. A photo library is neither.
4 net votes
Matt O'Brien@pi_tinker_matt#4 in Self Hosted
My numbers in Brisbane are about the same per kWh, the Pi cluster is 22W which is nothing. The bus factor section hit home. The wife has asked for a Binder too
-1 net votes
Henning Brockmann@henning_hh1 rep in Self Hosted
58 W is a very honest number, many people post the idle value and not the average. In Germany at around 32 ct/kWh this would be about 163 € per year for the power. My lab was 52 W and is now 31 W after I replaced an old NAS with 2 big disks instead of 5 small ones. Fewer disks is the biggest saving, more than the CPU.
4 net votes