Skip to content
experience

90 days with a smartwatch and I'm back on a $20 Casio

Trey Robinson@techwithtrey

June 23, 2026 · 2 min read

I owe y'all an honest update, because I hyped smartwatches pretty hard on the channel back in the day.

In March I bought a flagship smartwatch (my money, $429 with tax) and committed to wearing it every day for 90 days. No switching, no "review mode". Just living with it. On day 91 I put on a $20 Casio and I haven't taken it off since.

What actually happened

  • Charging became a chore I hated. Every night or every other night. Miss one and the sleep tracking (the thing I bought it for) is gone. I charged it 61 times in 90 days. I counted. That's my brain now.
  • Notifications got worse, not better. I thought it would mean less phone. It meant my wrist buzzed in every conversation. I turned off almost everything by week 3, and then it was a very expensive clock.
  • The health stuff was... fine? Step counts close enough. Heart rate on runs close to my chest strap at a steady pace, way off on intervals. Sleep score told me I slept "great" on nights I absolutely did not.
  • The strap gave me a rash. Atlanta in June plus silicone. Switched to a nylon strap, problem solved, but come on.

What I miss

Paying with my wrist. That's honestly it. Tap to pay at the gas station is really nice. Kitchen timers, second place.

The Casio

Tells the time. Has a stopwatch. The battery will outlive my car. Nobody can message me on it.

Here's the thing: I don't think smartwatches are bad. If you run seriously, or you need fall detection for a parent, they're great. But I bought one to "be healthier and use my phone less" and it did neither. That's the regret.

Verdict for people like me: Skip. For runners and for older parents: Buy, but the mid-tier one, not the flagship. 💀

Get the best of #gadget_graveyard weekly

One email each Monday with the most useful posts. No spam; unsubscribe in one click.

Comments

9

Sign in to join the conversation.

Sign in to comment
Dazza@dazza_rates_ur_desk#5 in Gadget Graveyard
imagine paying 429 bucks to get a rash and a sleep score that lies to u. casio gets 8/10 which is the highest score i have ever given anything
3 net votes
Trey Robinson@techwithtrey#1 in Gadget Graveyard
Screenshot this y'all. Dazza gave something an 8. I'll never top that.
1 net votes
Renee Whitfield@renee_em1 rep in Gadget Graveyard
The 'turned off every notification by week 3' arc is so familiar. I kept mine for one reason: it taps my wrist when a 1:1 is about to start, so I never check a screen in front of my report. Everything else is off. That one feature is worth it to me, and I wouldn't pay flagship price for it either. What would make you go back?
3 net votes
Dana Kowalski@dana_ml1 rep in Gadget Graveyard
On the heart rate point: optical sensors at the wrist generally lag on fast changes, so intervals are the known worst case. Comparing against a chest strap is the right method. Most reviews skip it.
9 net votes
Trey Robinson@techwithtrey#1 in Gadget Graveyard
Appreciate that. I wanted 10 interval sessions for the review but my knees said 4.
3 net votes
Olivier Gagnon@ogagnon1 rep in Gadget Graveyard
Same story here with a fitness band, I am agree with everything. Now a Casio too. My wife says I look like a dad. I am a dad, so, c'est correct.
1 net votes
Emily Tsai@emily_tsai#7 in Gadget Graveyard
Fall detection is the reason my mother wears one. It went off once, correctly. That alone was worth the price for our family.
5 net votes
Gwen Albright@gwenprints#3 in Gadget Graveyard
And the battery in that watch, when it dies in year three, is replaceable how, exactly? (I know the answer. I want you to say it on camera.)
8 net votes
Trey Robinson@techwithtrey#1 in Gadget Graveyard
Mail-in service. You win again Gwen. I'm adding a repairability section to every review from now on, promise.
1 net votes